Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDelgado-González, Alberto
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Viaji, Juan José
dc.contributor.authorCriado-Albillos, Guillermo
dc.contributor.authorMartín-Rodríguez, Adoración del Pilar
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Santos, Josefa
dc.contributor.authorLópez-Liria, Remedios
dc.contributor.authorCollazo-Riobo, Carla
dc.contributor.authorSoto-Cámara, Raúl
dc.contributor.authorGonzález-Bernal, Jerónimo J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-07-21T07:45:57Z
dc.date.available2021-07-21T07:45:57Z
dc.date.issued2021-05-26
dc.identifier.issn2077-0383
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10835/11977
dc.description.abstractThere are many studies whose results reveal possible risk factors for developing an infection after a total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this study is to analyse the risk factors that depend on the hospital and, especially, if the patellar replacement influences the appearance of periprosthetic infection. A retrospective study was performed, where data from the electronic registry of patients of people over 18 and who had undergone TKA, between the years 2015 and 2018, were reviewed. Dependent variables on the patients and the health care system were collected. The possible associations between the factors and the appearance of infection after TKA were studied using univariate and multivariate regression analyses. A total of 907 primary knee arthroplasties were included in the study. Those patients who had their patella replaced had a significantly higher risk of developing an infection (OR 2.07; 95% confidence interval 1.01–6.31). Likewise, patients who underwent surgery by surgeons with more than 10 years of experience were more than twice as likely to become infected than those operated on by younger surgeons (OR 2.64; 95%CI 1.01–6.97). Male patients were also found to be three times more likely to be infected than women (OR 2.99; 95%CI 1.32–5.74). Those interventions that were longer had a higher risk of infection. The same happened with patients who stayed in the hospital for a longer period of time. The rest of the variables did not show statistically significant results. In this study, it was found that the replacement of the patella may be a factor of infection, but it should be corroborated with randomized clinical trials. Furthermore, patients who underwent longer surgeries or those with prolonged hospital stays should be closely monitored to detect infection as soon as possible and establish the most appropriate treatment.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectpatellaes_ES
dc.subjecttotal knee arthroplastyes_ES
dc.subjectinfectiones_ES
dc.titleExplanatory Factors for Periprosthetic Infection in Total Knee Arthroplastyes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/10/11/2315es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional