Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCarvajal Ramírez, Fernando 
dc.contributor.authorMarques da Silva, José Rafael
dc.contributor.authorAgüera Vega, Francisco 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Carricondo, Patricio Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorSerrano, João
dc.contributor.authorMoral, Francisco Jesús
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-17T13:03:21Z
dc.date.available2020-01-17T13:03:21Z
dc.date.issued2019-04-26
dc.identifier.issn2072-4292
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10835/7572
dc.description.abstractFire severity is a key factor for management of post-fire vegetation regeneration strategies because it quantifies the impact of fire, describing the amount of damage. Several indices have been developed for estimation of fire severity based on terrestrial observation by satellite imagery. In order to avoid the implicit limitations of this kind of data, this work employed an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) carrying a high-resolution multispectral sensor including green, red, near-infrared, and red edge bands. Flights were carried out pre- and post-controlled fire in a Mediterranean forest. The products obtained from the UAV-photogrammetric projects based on the Structure from Motion (SfM) algorithm were a Digital Surface Model (DSM) and multispectral images orthorectified in both periods and co-registered in the same absolute coordinate system to find the temporal differences (d) between pre- and post-fire values of the Excess Green Index (EGI), Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), and Normalized Difference Red Edge (NDRE) index. The differences of indices (dEGI, dNDVI, and dNDRE) were reclassified into fire severity classes, which were compared with the reference data identified through the in situ fire damage location and Artificial Neural Network classification. Applying an error matrix analysis to the three difference of indices, the overall Kappa accuracies of the severity maps were 0.411, 0.563, and 0.211 and the Cramer’s Value statistics were 0.411, 0.582, and 0.269 for dEGI, dNDVI, and dNDRE, respectively. The chi-square test, used to compare the average of each severity class, determined that there were no significant differences between the three severity maps, with a 95% confidence level. It was concluded that dNDVI was the index that best estimated the fire severity according to the UAV flight conditions and sensor specifications.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectFire Severityes_ES
dc.subjectUAVes_ES
dc.subjectMultispectral Imageryes_ES
dc.titleEvaluation of Fire Severity Indices Based on Pre- and Post-Fire Multispectral Imagery Sensed from UAVes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/9/993es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional