The Rejection of Falstaff.

dc.contributor.author	Torres Núñez, Juan José
dc.date.accessioned	2012-02-22T19:46:27Z
dc.date.available	2012-02-22T19:46:27Z
dc.date.issued	2001
dc.identifier.issn	1578-3820
dc.identifier.issn	2174-1611
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/10835/1007
dc.description.abstract	This article discusses the rejection of Falstaff comparing Act 5, scene 5 of 2 Henry IV, with Act 1, scene 2 of 1 Henry IV. The rejection is inevitable because Falstaff represents disorder. His triumph would mean the victory of anarchy over order, stability and justice. But we become so involved with him that we even tolerate his conspiracies. He is clever, funny and one of the most fascinating characters in English literature. The two plays show the Prince as a good student of Machiavelli; we could consider them as a practical guide to instruct the Prince in his road to power.	es_ES
dc.language.iso	en	es_ES
dc.publisher	Universidad de Almería	es_ES
dc.source	Odisea : Revista de Estudios Ingleses. Número 01, Enero-Diciembre 2001	es_ES
dc.subject	Falstaff	es_ES
dc.subject	Shakespeare, William (1564-1616)	es_ES
dc.subject	Crítica literaria	es_ES
dc.title	The Rejection of Falstaff.	es_ES
dc.type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion	http://www.ual.es/odisea/Odisea01_TorresN.pdf	es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	es_ES
dc.identifier.doi	http://dx.doi.org/10.25115/odisea.v0i1.9