Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorSánchez-Hermosilla López, Julián 
dc.contributor.authorPérez Alonso, José 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Carricondo, Patricio Jesús 
dc.contributor.authorCarvajal Ramírez, Fernando 
dc.contributor.authorAgüera Vega, Francisco 
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-29T15:54:30Z
dc.date.available2022-06-29T15:54:30Z
dc.date.issued2022-06-17
dc.identifier.issn2311-7524
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10835/13864
dc.description.abstractGreenhouse vegetable production is of great importance in southern Europe. It is a cultivation system characterised by a high planting density and environmental conditions that favour the development of pests and diseases. Although alternatives to chemical pest and disease control have been used over recent years in greenhouse crops, it is still mostly plant protection products that are used to protect crops and prevent crop losses. Hand-held spraying equipment is mainly used to apply plant protection products to this type of crop. This equipment is technologically basic, offering low deposition efficiency in the plant canopy, high losses to the ground, and a high risk of worker exposure. In this context, it is important to utilise technologies that reduce the problems associated with using the conventional hand-held sprayers in greenhouses. This study evaluated the deposition and uniformity in the plant canopy and the losses to the ground when applying plant protection products with an electrostatic hand-held sprayer; the results were then compared with applications carried out using a conventional hand-held sprayer. For this purpose, a colorimetric method has been used based on the application of a tartrazine solution. The tests showed that the electrostatic spraying equipment increased the plant canopy deposition by 1.48 times that of the hand-held spray gun, resulting in a 48% reduction in the application rate. There was also a 1.78-times increase in deposition on the underside of the leaves and a 36.36% reduction in losses to the ground. In general, the electrostatic hand-held sprayer improves the effectiveness of the plant canopy deposition and reduces losses to the ground compared to the hand-held spray gun commonly used in pest and disease control.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherMDPIes_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectplant protection productses_ES
dc.subjectelectrostatic sprayeres_ES
dc.subjectgreenhousees_ES
dc.subjecthand-held sprayeres_ES
dc.subjectpepperes_ES
dc.titleEvaluation of Electrostatic Spraying Equipment in a Greenhouse Pepper Cropes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.mdpi.com/2311-7524/8/6/541es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/horticulturae8060541


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional