Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorAvsec, Andreja
dc.contributor.authorEisenbeck, Nikolett 
dc.contributor.authorFernández Carreño, David 
dc.contributor.authorKocjan, Gaja Zager
dc.contributor.authorKavčič, Tina
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-28T18:15:11Z
dc.date.available2023-03-28T18:15:11Z
dc.date.issued2022-10
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10835/14470
dc.description.abstractPeople's psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic is significantly affected by their psychological inflexibility. One possible mechanism explaining the association between psychological inflexibility and psychological functioning concerns coping styles. While avoidance and approach coping styles were previously found to mediate this association, the mediating role of meaning-centered coping has not yet been explored. However, meaning-centered coping it is likely to be crucial in circumstances as uncertain as those at the onset of the COVID -19 pandemic. This study explored the mediating role of the three coping styles in the relationship of psychological inflexibility with ill-being and well-being. Slovenian adults (N = 1365) aged 18–81 years provided self-reports on the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale, the PERMA Profiler, the Brief COPE Inventory, and the Meaning-Centered Coping Scale. In the context of the highly stressful beginning of the pandemic, psychological inflexibility contributed to higher ill-being and lower well-being directly and through increased use of avoidance coping, decreased use of meaning-centered coping, and, to a lesser extent, decreased use of approach coping. Avoidance coping predicted higher levels of ill-being, suggesting a maladaptive effect of this coping strategy. Approach coping positively but weakly predicted well-being, indicating a diminished value of this coping style in low-controllable circumstances of the pandemic. Finally, meaning-centered coping appeared to be the most beneficial in such circumstances, as it was associated with both lower levels of ill-being and higher levels of well-being. This finding suggests that meaning-centered coping should be studied as a stand-alone strategy, rather than as a combination of specific approach coping strategies. Consistent with previous research, this study demonstrates the importance of psychological inflexibility in effectively adapting to and actively coping with aversive situations. Furthermore, the results suggest that seeking or making meaning is vital, at least in a context characterized by low levels of control and high levels of uncertainty.es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherJournal of Contextual Behavioral Sciencees_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.sourceJournal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 26, 201-209es_ES
dc.subjectpsicologíaes_ES
dc.subjectflexibilidad psicológicaes_ES
dc.subjectcovid-19es_ES
dc.subjectsentido en la vidaes_ES
dc.subjectafrontamientoes_ES
dc.subjectbienestar psicológicoes_ES
dc.titleCoping styles mediate the association between psychological inflexibility and psychological functioning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A crucial role of meaning-centered copinges_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2022.10.001
dc.relation.projectIDPSICOV20-652016-Pes_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional