Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGarrido Frenich, Antonia 
dc.contributor.authorPlaza Bolaños, Patricia 
dc.contributor.authorMartínez Vidal, José Luis 
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-25T11:01:52Z
dc.date.available2024-01-25T11:01:52Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Chromatography A, 1203 (2008) 229–238es_ES
dc.identifier.issn0021-9673
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10835/15446
dc.description.abstractGas chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) is one of the most powerful techniques in pesticide residue analysis. MS/MS can be conceived in two ways: tandem in space (e.g. triple quadrupole, QqQ) or in time (e.g. ion trap, IT). QqQ and IT are commonly interfaced to GC; however, there has not been any direct comparison between them in pesticide residue analysis so far. In the present work, the performance of GC coupled to these two analyzers (GC-QqQ-MS/MS and GC-IT-MS/MS) was studied and compared for pesticide residue analysis as well as its application in food analysis. The large volume injection (LVI) technique together with programmed-temperature vaporization (PTV) was applied. For this purpose, 19 pesticides, including organochlorine and organophophorus pesticides and pyrethroids, were analyzed in both systems. Mass spectrometric data, performance characteristics (linearity, intra-day and inter-day precision) and the influence of the matrix nature on the analysis of low concentrations were compared. The target compounds were analyzed in solvent and in two representative food matrices such as cucumber (high water content) and egg (high fat content). MS data and intra-day precision were similar in QqQ and IT, whereas inter-day precision was significantly worse in QqQ. Linearity (expressed as determination coefficient, R2) in the range 10-150 μg L-1 was adequate in both systems; however, better R2 values were obtained with the QqQ analyzer in high and low concentration ranges (1-50 and 1-750 μg L-1, respectively). The influence of the matrix nature on the analysis of low concentrations of each analyzer was also evaluated. The QqQ and IT performance was similar in cucumber and solvent. However, QqQ provided better sensitivity in egg working in selected reaction monitoring (SRM).es_ES
dc.language.isoenes_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/*
dc.subjectTriple quadrupolees_ES
dc.subjectIon trapes_ES
dc.subjectTandem in spacees_ES
dc.subjectTandem in timees_ES
dc.subjectMass spectrometryes_ES
dc.subjectPesticidees_ES
dc.subjectFood analysises_ES
dc.titleComparison of tandem-in-space and tandem-in-time mass spectrometry in gas chromatography determination of pesticides: Application to simple and complex food sampleses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.chroma.2008.07.041
dc.relation.projectIDAndalusian Government, Consejería de Innovación, Ciencia y Empresa, Junta de Andalucía, project ref. P05-FQM-0202; FPU, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, Ref. AP2005-3800es_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional